Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is a clinically useful predictor for aggressive basal cell carcinoma

Article information

Kosin Med J. 2018;33(1):75-84
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 January 21
doi : https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.2018.33.1.75
1Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Kosin University, Busan, Korea
2Department of Plastic Surgery Medicine, Ritz Plastic Surgery Clinic, Geoje, Korea
3Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Kosin University, Busan, Korea
Corresponding Author: Hee Kyung Chang, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Kosin University, 262, Gamchen-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49267, Korea Tel: +82-51-990-6476 Fax: +82-51-990-3045 E-mail: fmcjs@naver.com
Received 2017 November 29; 2017 December 13; Accepted 2018 January 22.

Abstract

Objectives

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) tumors are locally invasive but rarely metastatic. However, aggressive metastatic variants are being increasingly reported in elderly people. Here we investigated the clinical utility of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a predictive biomarker for aggressive BCC variants.

Methods

Thirty-five pathologically confirmed cases of BCC that underwent surgical removal in the Plastic Surgery Department between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 were studied. VEGF expression was analyzed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue by immunohistochemical staining. Positive staining was defined as more than 10% of the tumor cells showing immunoreactivity. The associations of VEGF expression with various clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed.

Results

The face was the most prevalent site (28/35), with 15 cases from the nose, 6 cases from the eyelid, and 5 cases from the cheek. The patients were aged between 41 and 86 years, with a mean age of 69.26 ± 173.903 years. The mean BCC size was 1.34 ± 3.853 cm, with a range of 0.3 cm to 12.0 cm. The mean tumor invasion depth from the basement epidermal membrane was 0.17 ± 0.035 cm, with a range of 0.03 cm to 1.10 cm. A mean of 5.66 ± 20.938 intraoperative frozen section slides were examined. VEGF was not expressed in 14 of the 35 patients (40.0%), whereas 42.9% of the patients had low expression and 17.1% of the patients had high expression. VEGF expression was significantly associated with age (P = 0.022), size (P = 0.030), site (P = 0.013), tumor invasion depth (P = 0.019), and number of intraoperatively frozen sections (P = 0.003).

Conclusions

These results suggest that VEGF expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry can predict aggressive or poor prognosis in BCC.

Fig. 1.

The pathologic findings of Basal cell carcinoma of skin on the face. (H-E, x100)

Fig. 2.

The expression of VEGF by immunostaining in the basal cell carcinoma (x100) (A) Negative expression of VEGF in the basal cell carcinoma (B) Low-expression of VEGF in the basal cell carcinoma (C) High-expression of VEGF in the basal cell carcinoma

The association of VEGF expression with clinicopathologic variables in the basal cell carinoma

References

1. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Harris AR, Hinckley MR, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB, et al. Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States, 2006. Arch Dermatol 2010;146:283–7.
2. Marghoob A, Kopf AW, Bart RS, Sanfilippo L, Silverman MK, Lee P, et al. Risk of another basal cell carcinoma developing after treatment of a basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28:22–8. 3. Marzuka AG, Book SE. Basal cell carcinoma: pathogenesis, epideriology, clinical features, diagnosis, histopathology, and mangement. Yale J Biol Med 2015;88: 167-79.
4. Linos E, Chren MM, Stijacic Cenzer I, Covinsky KE. Skin Cancer in U.S. Elderly Adults: Does Life Expectancy Play a Role in Treatment Decisions? J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64:1610–5.
5. Dvorak HF. Angiogenesis: update 2005. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:1835–42.
6. Mueller MM, Fusenig NE. Tumor-stroma interactions directing phenotype and progression of epithelial skin tumor cells. Differentiation 2002;70:486–97.
7. Gaitanis G, Bassukas I. Intralesional bevacizumab as in-add adjuvant to immunocryosurery for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014;28:1117–21.
8. Larcher F, Murillas R, Bolontrade M, Conti CJ, Jorcano JL. VEGF/VPF overexpression in skin of transgenic mice induces angiogenesis, vascular hyperpermeability and accelerated tumor development. Oncogene 1998;17:303–11.
9. Wilgus TA, Matthies AM, Radek KA, Dovi JV, Burns AL, Shankar R, et al. Novel function for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 on epidermal keratinocytes. Am J Pathol 2005;167:1257–66.
10. Beck B, Driessens G, Goossens S, Youssef KK, Kuchnio A, Caauwe A, et al. A vascular niche and a VEGF-Nrp1 loop regulate the initiation and stemness of skin tumours. Nature 2011;478:399–403.
11. Lichtenberger BM, Tan PK, Niederleithner H, Ferrara N, Petzelbauer P, Sibilia M. Autocrine VEGF signaling synergizes with EGFR in tumor cells to promote epithelial cancer development. Cell 2010;140:268–79.
12. Zhu JW, Wu XJ, Luo D, Lu ZF, Cai SQ, Zheng M. Activation of VEGFr-2 signaling in response to moderate dose of ultraviolet B promotes survival of normal human keratinocytes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012;44:246–56.
13. Folkman J. The role of angiogenesis in tumor growth. Semin Cancer Biol 1992;3:65–7.
14. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 2005;438:932–6. 15. Hanahan D, Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 1996;86: 353-64.
16. Viac J, Palacio S, Schmitt D, Claudy A. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in normal epidermis, epithelial tumors and cultured keratinocytes. Arch Dermatol Res 1997;289:158–63.
17. Bowden J, Brennan PA, Umar T, Cronin A. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Cutan Pathol 2002;29:585–9.
18. Weninger W, Uthman A, Pammer J, Pichler A, Ballaun C, Lang IM, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor production in normal epidermis and in benign and malignant epithelial skin tumors. Lab Invest 1996;75:647–57.
19. Larcher F, Robles AI, Duran H, Murillas R, Quintanilla M, Cano A, et al. Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor in mouse skin carcinogenesis correlates with malignant progression state and activated H-ras expression levels. Carcinogenesis 1996;56:5391–6.
20. Hirakawa S, Kodama S, Kunstfeld R, Kajiya K, Brown LF, Detmar M. VEGF-A induces tumor and sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and promotes lymphatic metastasis. J Exp Med 2005;201:1089–99.
21. Branson SV, McClintic E, Ozgur O, Esmaeli B, Yeatts RP. Orbitofacial Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma: Report of 10 Cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;33:213–7.
22. Greenberg JI, Shields DJ, Barillas SG, Acevedo LM, Murphy E, Huang J, et al. A role for VEGF as a negative regulator of pericyte function and vessel maturation. Nature 2008;456:809–13.
23. Lu KV, Chang JP, Parachoniak CA, Pandika MM, Aghi MK, Meyronet D, et al. VEGF inhibits tumor cell invasion and mesenchymal transition through a MET/VEGFR2 complex. Cancer Cell 2012;22:21–35.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

The pathologic findings of Basal cell carcinoma of skin on the face. (H-E, x100)

Fig. 2.

The expression of VEGF by immunostaining in the basal cell carcinoma (x100) (A) Negative expression of VEGF in the basal cell carcinoma (B) Low-expression of VEGF in the basal cell carcinoma (C) High-expression of VEGF in the basal cell carcinoma

Table 1.

The association of VEGF expression with clinicopathologic variables in the basal cell carinoma

variables total (n = 35) (%) Cases of VEGF expression Pvalue according to positivity (expression level)
negative(%) (n = 14) Positive reaction(n = 21)
total of Positivity (%) low(%) (n = 15) high(%) (n = 6)
mean age 69.26 ± 103.903 63 ± 14.486 73.41 ± 10.915 73.47 ± 10.954 73.33 ± 10.875 0.000 (0.022)
gender male 15(42.9) 7(46.7) 8(5.5) 5(33.3) 3(20.2) 0.096 (0.120)
female 20(53.1) 7(25.0) 13(75.0) 10(60.0) 3(15.0)
mean size (cm) 1.34 ± 3.852 0.709 ± 0.289 1.645 ± 1.875 1.923 ± 2.897 1.367 ± 0.582 0.000 (0.030)
site 0.002 (0.013)
face 28(80.0) 9(32.1) 19(67.9) 14(50.0) 5(17.9)
non-face 7(20.0) 5(64.4) 2(33.6) 1(14.3) 1(14.3)
invasion depth(mm) 1.7 ± 0.035 1.21 ± 0.092 1.79 ± 0.495 2.21 ± 0.26 1.63 ± 0.71 0.000 (0.019)
numbers of frozen section 5.66 ± 20.94 3.29 ± 2.76 8.02 ± 5.121 6.20 ± 4.13 9.83 ± 6.11 0.000 (0.003)