The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into medical research introduces significant ethical challenges that necessitate the strengthening of ethical frameworks. This review highlights the issues of privacy, bias, accountability, informed consent, and regulatory compliance as central concerns. AI systems, particularly in medical research, may compromise patient data privacy, perpetuate biases if they are trained on nondiverse datasets, and obscure accountability owing to their “black box” nature. Furthermore, the complexity of the role of AI may affect patients’ informed consent, as they may not fully grasp the extent of AI involvement in their care. Compliance with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and General Data Protection Regulation is essential, as they address liability in cases of AI errors. This review advocates a balanced approach to AI autonomy in clinical decisions, the rigorous validation of AI systems, ongoing monitoring, and robust data governance. Engaging diverse stakeholders is crucial for aligning AI development with ethical norms and addressing practical clinical needs. Ultimately, the proactive management of AI’s ethical implications is vital to ensure that its integration into healthcare improves patient outcomes without compromising ethical integrity.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Care: Advancements in Bone Care and Future Directions Rahul Kumar, Kyle Sporn, Joshua Ong, Ethan Waisberg, Phani Paladugu, Swapna Vaja, Tamer Hage, Tejas C. Sekhar, Amar S. Vadhera, Alex Ngo, Nasif Zaman, Alireza Tavakkoli, Mouayad Masalkhi Bioengineering.2025; 12(5): 513. CrossRef
Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology Tesfaye Wolde, Vipul Bhardwaj, Vijay Pandey MedComm.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Case Report: Intranasal esketamine combined with a form of generative artificial intelligence in the management of treatment-resistant depression Alexandre Fraichot, Sophie Favre, Hélène Richard-Lepouriel Frontiers in Psychiatry.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Future Designs of Clinical Trials in Nephrology: Integrating Methodological Innovation and Computational Power Camillo Tancredi Strizzi, Francesco Pesce Sensors.2025; 25(16): 4909. CrossRef
The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics: comprehensive review of current benefits and challenges Salar Baghbani, Yoosef Mehrabi, Mohammad Movahedinia, Erfan Babaeinejad, Mohammadamin Joshaghanian, Shayan Amiri, Mostafa Shahrezaee Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Human-in-the-Loop Performance of LLM-Assisted Arterial Blood Gas Interpretation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Sergio Ayala-De la Cruz, Paola Elizabeth Arenas-Hernández, María Fernanda Fernández-Herrera, Rebeca Alejandrina Quiñones-Díaz, Jorge Martín Llaca-Díaz, Erik Alejandro Díaz-Chuc, Diana Guadalupe Robles-Espino, Erik Alejandro San Miguel-Garay Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(18): 6676. CrossRef
Applications, Challenges, and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering Medical Education: Scoping Review Yuhang Lin, Zhiheng Luo, Zicheng Ye, Nuoxi Zhong, Lijian Zhao, Long Zhang, Xiaolan Li, Zetao Chen, Yijia Chen JMIR Medical Education.2025; 11: e71125. CrossRef
Ética, empatia e IA: como equilibrar decisões automatizadas e julgamento clínico humanizado Iranildo Lopes de Oliveira, Rivana Ferreira de Souza, João Victor de Amorim Batista, Iara Costa Silvano, Ana Caroline Rocha de Melo Leite, Rodolfo de Melo Nunes Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo.2025; 17(10): e9794. CrossRef
Machine learning in lupus nephritis: bridging prediction models and clinical decision-making towards personalized nephrology Diego Fernando Garcia-Bañol, Adrianny Mahelis Arias-Choles, Silvia Aldana-Peréz, Gustavo J. Aroca-Martínez, Carlos Guido Musso, Roberto Navarro-Quiroz, Alex Dominguez-Vargas, Henry J. Gonzalez-Torres Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef